Free Content Alerts
20 June 2013
About World Economics
Trial sign up
Submit an article
Competition & regulation
Country & regional studies
Crime & corruption
Growth & development
Innovation & technology
International trade & investment
Knowledge, intellectual property
Labour, demographics, households
Measurement & statistics
Sport, leisure, the arts
Economists and Sustainable Development
The OECD Report on Policies for Sustainable Development
Volume 2, Number 4, 2001
, pages 1 - 17
The OECD report is almost exclusively about environmental policy (on which it contains a mass of useful data and discussion). There is, commendably, hardly any discussion of the implications of the usual core condition in consensus definitions of sustainable development, namely that there should be no future decline in per capita welfare. Economists would also do well to ignore this condition, and hence the problem of a possible conflict between optimality and sustainability. And, insofar as it is believed that there is a conflict, we should opt for optimality since the ethical grounds for not doing so—e.g. that pure time preference over generations is unethical or that we have to respect the rights of future generations—are weak. A second major omission is more serious and is the report’s failure to get to grips with crucial constitutive and instrumental components of sustainable development, notably civil and political liberties.
CALL FOR PAPERS
World Economics Journal is
calling for the submission of papers
to the Managing Editor on economic, statistical and accounting issues connected with the production, use and utility of economic data.
Sign up for
, data and analysis from World Economics.
FREE CONTENT ALERTS
To subscribe to our free 'Content Alerts' please fill in your details below:
Copyright © 2013 Economic and Financial Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.